Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.inkwell.finance/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY © 2026 Inkwell Finance, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice, nor an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security or other financial instrument. Any examples, structures, or flows described here are design intent only and may change.
The structural answer
Dagon’s submission primitive is a six-parameter schedule, not a point order. Schedule amounts are quantized to cents, which gives:- Floor: $0.01 per schedule. This is the smallest representable amount in the primitive.
- Ceiling: ~$42.9M per schedule. This is the largest amount that fits the schedule’s fixed-width integer representation.
1/N
lane-anonymity bound across schedules from the same submitter.
Why a floor at all
Dagon is not a retail venue. Retail-sized micro-transactions are out of scope by design because:- The batch-clearing mechanism amortizes per-epoch cost across participants. Below a certain notional the batch economics don’t work.
- The institutional posture (Reg ATS / MiCA / MiFID II compliance claims) depends on not being a retail gateway.
- Swapping to a lit AMM is the right tool for small trades; sub-cent execution isn’t what this venue is for.
What this means per audience
- Institutional MMs / block desks: the primitive is designed for you. A full six-parameter inventory schedule fits a single submission; curve shapes can cover depth ranging from a few thousand dollars up to ~$42.9M per schedule. Multi-schedule submission scales deeper.
- Sophisticated individual traders (seven-figure+ portfolios): welcome. There is no gated whitelist beyond the credential. Your execution economics depend on how you size relative to other participants in the same batch.
- Mass retail: use an AMM. Dagon accepts submissions down to the cent floor, but at that scale the per-batch mechanics don’t give you a better outcome than lit liquidity.